T0, for Ferritic Steels in the Transition Range,ASTM International, 10/31/2022" /> $ Currency € Euro £ Pound Sterling $ US Dollar My Account Register Login Shopping Cart Checkout 0 item(s) - $0.00 Your shopping cart is empty! Menu HOME POPULAR PUBLISHERS AWS ASME ACI API AS ASME CONTACT US MY ACCOUNT ASTM ASTM E1921-22a ASTM E1921-22a Standard Test Method for Determination of Reference Temperature, T0, for Ferritic Steels in the Transition Range ASTM International, 10/31/2022 Publisher: ASTM File Format: PDF $49.00$98.00 Add to Cart Description Published:31/10/2022 Pages:40 File Size:1 file , 820 KB Note:This product is unavailable in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus 1.1 This test method covers the determination of a reference temperature, T0, which characterizes the fracture toughness of ferritic steels that experience onset of cleavage cracking at elastic, or elastic-plastic KJc instabilities, or both. The specific types of ferritic steels (3.2.2) covered are those with yield strengths ranging from 275 to 825 MPa (40 to 120 ksi) and weld metals, after stress-relief annealing, that have 10 % or less strength mismatch relative to that of the base metal. 1.2 The specimens covered are fatigue precracked single-edge notched bend bars, SE(B), and standard or disk-shaped compact tension specimens, C(T) or DC(T). A range of specimen sizes with proportional dimensions is recommended. The dimension on which the proportionality is based is specimen thickness. 1.3 Median KJc values tend to vary with the specimen type at a given test temperature, presumably due to constraint differences among the allowable test specimens in 1.2. The degree of KJc variability among specimen types is analytically predicted to be a function of the material flow properties (1)2 and decreases with increasing strain hardening capacity for a given yield strength material. This KJc dependency ultimately leads to discrepancies in calculated T0 values as a function of specimen type for the same material. T0 values obtained from C(T) specimens are expected to be higher than T0 values obtained from SE(B) specimens. Best estimate comparisons of several materials indicate that the average difference between C(T) and SE(B)-derived T0 values is approximately 10°C (2). C(T) and SE(B) T0 differences up to 15 °C have also been recorded (3). However, comparisons of individual, small datasets may not necessarily reveal this average trend. Datasets which contain both C(T) and SE(B) specimens may generate T0 results which fall between the T0 values calculated using solely C(T) or SE(B) specimens. It is therefore strongly recommended that the specimen type be reported along with the derived T0 value in all reporting, analysis, and discussion of results. This recommended reporting is in addition to the requirements in 11.1.1. 1.4 Requirements are set on specimen size and the number of replicate tests that are needed to establish acceptable characterization of KJc data populations. 1.5 T0 is dependent on loading rate. T0 is evaluated for a quasi-static loading rate range with 0.1< dK/dt < 2 MPa√m/s. Slowly loaded specimens (dK/dt < 0.1 MPa√m) can be analyzed if environmental effects are known to be negligible. Provision is also made for higher loading rates (dK/dt > 2 MPa√m/s) in Annex A1. Note that this threshold loading rate for application of Annex A1 is a much lower threshold than is required in other fracture toughness test methods such as E399 and E1820. 1.6 The statistical effects of specimen size on KJc in the transition range are treated using the weakest-link theory (4) applied to a three-parameter Weibull distribution of fracture toughness values. A limit on KJc values, relative to the specimen size, is specified to ensure high constraint conditions along the crack front at fracture. For some materials, particularly those with low strain hardening, this limit may not be sufficient to ensure that a single-parameter (KJc) adequately describes the crack-front deformation state (5). 1.7 Statistical methods are employed to predict the transition toughness curve and specified tolerance bounds for 1T specimens of the material tested. The standard deviation of the data distribution is a function of Weibull slope and median KJc. The procedure for applying this information to the establishment of transition temperature shift determinations and the establishment of tolerance limits is prescribed. 1.8 The procedures described in this test method assume that the data set represents a macroscopically homogeneous material, such that the test material has uniform tensile and toughness properties. Application of this test method to an inhomogeneous material will result in an inaccurate estimate of the transition reference value ASTM D6048-07 Standard Practice for Stress Relaxation Testing of Raw Rubber, Unvulcanized Rubber Compounds, and Thermoplastic Elastomers $33.00 $67.00 Add to Cart ASTM D5624-02 Standard Test Method for Determining the Transverse-Aggregate Spread Rate for Surface Treatment Applications $26.00 $52.00 Add to Cart ASTM D3878-07 Standard Terminology for Composite Materials $30.00 $60.00 Add to Cart ASTM E2329-17 Standard Practice for Identification of Seized Drugs $24.00 $48.00 Add to Cart
Your shopping cart is empty!
ASTM International, 10/31/2022
Publisher: ASTM
File Format: PDF
$49.00$98.00
Published:31/10/2022
Pages:40
File Size:1 file , 820 KB
Note:This product is unavailable in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus
Standard Practice for Stress Relaxation Testing of Raw Rubber, Unvulcanized Rubber Compounds, and Thermoplastic Elastomers
$33.00 $67.00
Standard Test Method for Determining the Transverse-Aggregate Spread Rate for Surface Treatment Applications
$26.00 $52.00
Standard Terminology for Composite Materials
$30.00 $60.00
Standard Practice for Identification of Seized Drugs
$24.00 $48.00